Secretary
Bruce Babbitt said the proposal, unveiled two days after
the election last November by the Bureau of Land
Management, had been wracked by "confusion and
misinformation" and must gain "a higher level
of acceptance" before proceeding further.
In a letter to Idaho Gov. Phil Batt, Babbitt
promised "no further action will be taken" on
the proposal, which the BLM and Babbitt have continued to
contend would only have consolidated law enforcement
rules.
When Babbitt visited Idaho last month, Batt
had complained about the proposed changes which Idaho's
congressional delegation had begun protesting last
December.
Ranchers, sportsmen and Western politicians in
the West have viewed as an attempt by government to
expand its police powers, although BLM spokesmen have
usually insisted the agency was only seeking to
"streamline" its rules, for the benefit of the
public.
"This was clearly an attempt by this
agency to expand its current authority," Sen. Craig
Thomas, R-Wyoming, said Tuesday, praising Babbitt's
decision. "Law enforcement activities are the
responsibility of state

|

and local
authorities."
Sen. Conrad Burns, R-Mont., another sharp
critic of the proposal, said Babbitt "has done the
wise thing" in withdrawing the proposal, saying it
did not have the support of people that use the public
lands.
Even Nevada's Sen. Harry Reid, coming to the
issue finally last week in a Friday letter signed with
other senators, had called on the Department of Interior
to withdraw the proposed regulations.
"These proposed regulations go way too
far," Reid said. "Nevadans are rightfully
concerned with the BLM expanding its control over their
lives."
Since the new rules were published in
November, said Reid, hundreds of Nevadans had contacted
his office with their concerns.
Sylvia Baca, acting BLM director, acknowledged
the widespread concern among Westerners over the proposed
changes and said her agency would "go back to the
drawing board." The BLM, she said, would try to not
only develop ways to improve the law enforcement rules
but to "make them more understandable to public
lands users."
|