Mr. Morros' and Mr. Molini's relationship has put a very
dark cloud over all the state employees,
Hackworth said. "There are serious
problems with Morros' and Molini's policies and they
[NDOW] were untouchable by past legislators, directors
and other elected state officials.
Hackworth said Morros obviously does not
understand the workings of a grand jury, which are done
in secret without any outside influences.
"We do not direct the actions of the
grand jury," Hackworth said.
Hackworth said the grand jury was convened by
citizen petition signed by more than 4,000 voters, to
investigate crimes on public lands and later authorized
by former Elko District Judge Thomas Stringfield to bring
forward other criminal indictments.
"And for Pete Morros to make that kind of
accusation, maybe he ought to look at his own job -- he
doesn't listen to the populace who have gone before the
legislature to complain about the actions of NDOW and
he's never addressed those concerns," Hackworth
said.
Commenting on Morros' charge of a `home-rule'
conspiracy, Hackworth said: "The citizens of Elko
County are tired of agencies who invoke `bureaucratic
rule' and are not held accountable for their actions by

|
anyone who questions
their modus operandi.
Commissioner Tony Lesperance said Morros seems
to have a different sense of right and wrong.
"Did he mean 'above reproach' or above
the law? If he meant above reproach, then I am unaware of
anybody, including myself and the president of the United
States, that is above reproach. Obviously nobody is above
the law," Lesperance said. "We all have to be
held accountable.
In regards to Morros' threat of judicial
action, Lesperance said: "Without appearing before
the grand jury, pressure from Mr. Morros and from the
State of Nevada would be akin to jury tampering and I
believe that is a very serious offense.
In 1991, IMC sought permission from the forest
service to expand its operation. The Nevada Division of
Wildlife objected, saying 5,500 acres of mule deer
habitat would be disturbed. It also sought fees to
restore other lands disturbed by the company.
Negotiations started and a contract was signed for
Independence to pay a $500,000 mitigation fee to the
division.
Independence then got its permit from the
forest service to begin mining on the land in question.
The grand jury found no other mining company
had been required
|