When the potential cost
        of all spending legislation introduced by Nevada's
        senators in the previous two sessions of the 104th
        Congress are calculated, says the NTU, Nevada had the
        fifth least frugal delegation, proposing less spending
        only than the delegations from Massachusetts, West
        Virginia, South Carolina and Illinois.  
         Each year since 1991 the NTU has reported the
        findings of its "BillTally" system, a
        computerized accounting of the cost of all spending
        legislation before Congress.  
         Totals for all senators, say the taxpayer
        group, are developed by cross-indexing their sponsorship
        and co-sponsorship records with independent, third-party
        cost estimates. During the last congress that covered 346
        Senate bills introduced through February 29, 1996, and
        cosponsored through April 16, 1996.  
         The dollar totals are net, after senators'
        proposed spending reductions have also been figured in,
        said NTU, and do not double-count overlapping proposals.
        Members of Congress were given four weeks to
        confidentially review and comment on the completeness and
        accuracy of the data.  
         
         
            
         | 
         
            
         
         The
        effect of legislation introduced by Reid, during the
        104th, would have been a net increase in federal spending
        of $4,681 billion, said the NTU report, which the net
        increase in spending derived from Bryan bills would have
        been $508 million.  
         According to the taxpayer group, Reid wanted
        to spend more than 90 percent of the other senators,
        while Bryan wanted to spend more than 76 percent of the
        other members.  
         Although Reid sponsored legislation which
        would have reduced government spending by $3.54 billion,
        he also sponsored bills which would have cost a total of
        $8.22 billion. Bryan would have cut spending by about
        $6.11 billion, while raising it about $6.62 billion.  
         Nevada's senior senator already has a head
        start on another spendthrift designation from NTU for the
        $105th Congress, which began last month.  
         Although the taxpayer group has opposed the
        creation of "off-budget" funds, saying such
        actions "make it more difficult to balance the
        budget, control spending, or effectively set spending
        priorities," Senator Reid on Wednesday, Feb. 5
        introduced legislation to take the  
         |