Reid
was operating as Clinton Administration point man in a
last-ditch party-line struggle to block reimbursement of
some $500,000 in legal expenses of former White House
Travel Director Billy Ray Dale.
Dale, along with six co-workers, had been
fired in early 1993 by the White House in the affair that
later became known as 'Travelgate.' He was indicted by
the Clinton Justice Department but was found not guilty,
by a District of Columbia jury, after less than two hours
of deliberation. The reimbursement was a tiny provision
of a $23.5 billion bill financing the Internal Revenue
Service and other agencies. An amendment backed by
Democrats would have deleted the provision and sent the
question to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. The change
was rejected 52-46 on a straight party-line vote.
But before the vote, Reid repeatedly quoted
from sensitive Justice Department documents supposed to
be confidential under both department and congressional
regulations. Such actions, said Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, were
'appalling,' 'unconscionable,' and a clear effort to
'smear' Dale.
"Frankly, it really is a sin," Hatch
told Reid, a fellow Mormon.
Nevada's senior senator responded that it was
important to talk about 'facts.'
"There has been some talk about there
should not be talk on this floor about the prosecution
memo, about a plea of guilty," said Reid. "Mr.
President, we are not in court. We are in the Senate of
the United States, some say the greatest debating society
in the history of the world. I think it is appropriate,
in a great debating arena, to talk about the facts."
And it was a fact, said Reid, that it was
"really too bad" that Dale had been acquitted
by a jury.
"But it happens, it happens in our system
of justice."
One of the confidential documents used by Reid
on the Senate floor was an internal Department of Justice
prosecution memo, procured by Reid from minority members
of the House Oversight committee.
According to the Congressional Record, the
following was part of an exchange on the Senate floor
between senators Reid and Hatch:
Mr. REID. "I do not think it is my
obligation to indicate where the prosecution memo was
obtained, but I do know that I obtained it, and I do know
it did not come from anybody in the Justice Department,
did not come from anybody in the White House, directly or
indirectly..."
Mr. HATCH. "Would the Senator yield on
that for just a question?"
Mr. REID. "I will be happy to yield for a
question."
Mr. HATCH. "I appreciate my colleague
yielding. My question is this. I know the Senator did not
get it from the White House directly or from the Justice
Department directly, because the Senator told me where he
got it. The Senator got it from the House of
Representatives, which I presume, whomever they got it
from, got it from the White House or the Justice
Department. Those are the only two places it could have
been obtained. I am not accusing the Senator from Nevada,
although I question--I question--whether a document that
is so one sided should be used, especially a document
that is confidential. I question whether that sort of
document should be used on the floor of the Senate."
Mr. REID. "I say to my friend from Utah,
and he is my friend
Top of page
|
from the neighboring State of Utah, that
the prosecution memo sets forth facts in the case. We are
entitled in this body to have facts in the case. We have
heard a lot of facts over these many months from the
other side about this poor Billy Dale, how he has just
been put upon by everybody. The fact of the matter is, he
has not been. The fact of the matter is, he was indicted,
properly indicted. After having been indicted, he had a
letter written saying, 'I want to plead guilty.' And I
think we are entitled to hear that."
That letter, a plea-bargain effort by Dale's
attorney, was also supposed to be confidential under
Justice Department regulations. But even before it was
quoted by Nevada's Reid on the Senate floor, portions of
it had been leaked by administration officials to the
magazine U.S. News & World Report.
The letter offered federal prosecutors a deal
in which Dale would plead guilty to a charge of
"wrongful conversion," pay a fine not to exceed
$69,000, and accept up to 4 months imprisonment, one-half
of which was to be served in jail. Prosecutors did not
accept the deal.
"There is reason why the man was
indicted," said Reid, "and let us not forget
that Mr. Dale agreed...to plead guilty to
embezzlement."
But Hatch said that was false.
"The facts are ...that Mr. Dale never
agreed to admit to committing the essential elements
necessary for an embezzlement prosecution."
"He simply agreed to settle the case
without an admission of guilt. Any suggestion that such a
strategic tactic equates to an admission of guilt is
outrageous and is yet just a further attempt to smear Mr.
Dale's reputation.
"Let me tell you something. I have been
around courtrooms for many years of my life. I know a
number of people who weren't guilty that would enter a
plea to some really minor, lesser count so that they
would not get bled to death with attorney's fees, court
costs, ulcers, bad health, ruination of the family, and
101 other things that happen. Anybody that doesn't
understand that has never been in a court of law, or at
least doesn't understand, or just plain isn't telling the
truth."
Reid, though, continued to argue that,
notwithstanding the jury verdict, Dale had been
dishonest.
"Mr. Dale is, in my opinion, an admitted
crook," he said.
Reid also complained that "Dale has
received public support from many notable heavyweights in
the media" and that "At many Republican
fundraisers around the country, Billy Dale is the poster
boy."
"As it was reported in August in the
media, candidate Dole had offered him a job in his
Presidential campaign. He is still the subject of a
plethora of sympathetic pieces in the news by his old
friends in the media."
Reid contended the effort to pass the
reimbursement amendment was just an attempt to embarrass
Clinton.
"This has all culminated in today's
effort to attempt to embarrass the President by
appropriating $500,000 very quietly."
Reid also said Dale's personal motivation was
to "harrass" President Clinton.
"The fact of the matter is we are being
asked here to reimburse attorney's fees of $500,000 for
Billy Dale, his attorneys, so he can carry on this
campaign of harassment that he has been engaged in in the
past 6 months or year."
§ § §
|