Feds Get Weird
 Selective
Facts Good,
   Selective
Facts Good,|  Sometimes the scene before the
        federal district court jury in Reno last Wednesday got --
        there's no other word for it -- bizarre. | ||
|  U.S. government attorneys
        selectively recounted facts in their summation to the
        jury as they argued that garden center owner Jerry Keenan
        should be convicted of perjury.  And
        why should he be so convicted? Because, they said, he'd
        demonstrated "a selective memory" when talking
        to federal investigators.  "The
        defendant doesn't have the luxury of coming before you
        and minimizing things," Asst. U.S. Attorney Thomas
        O'Connell told jurors.  O'Connell
        then proceeded to minimize the help that Keenan had
        offered FBI and ATF agents in their investigation of the
        December 1995 bombing attempt at Reno's Internal Revenue
        Service offices.  "Dell
        Bidart gave the key information on the coffee klatch, so
        Keenan doesn't get any of the credit," said
        O'Connell.  But
        Keenan defense attorney Robert Ben Walker had already
        pointed out that when Keenan told FBI Special Agent
        William Jonkey and federal Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms
        agent Jim Doreen how to find "Crazy Joe"
        Bailie, the chief suspect now indicted, Keenan didn't
        know what other witnesses had, just hours before, told
        the agents. It was clear, said Walker, that Keenan was
        truly trying to help.  Then
        there was prosecution witness Ricky "Sarge"
        Hallert, former son-in-law and former employee of Keenan.  As
        Assistant U.S. Attorney Ron Rachow in his summation
        volunteered the next day, "Ricky Hallert is not the
        brightest guy in the world."  In
        fact, by the time Hallert got off the stand, it was clear
        that even Hallert didn't know what Hallert thought; he
        could be turned around in his testimony by almost anybody
        at anytime.  Almost
        his first words on the stand, elicited by federal
        prosecutors, were that he previously had lied to both the
        investigating agents and the federal grand jury.  Asked
        to explain why, he said that when called to the Keenan
        house to talk to the agents, he had felt intimidated by
        being in Keenan's home and hearing him tell the agents he
        "didn't know" something.  "I
        didn't want to call him a liar in his own house,"
        said Hallert.  Similarly,
        he said, he lied to the grand jury a week later because
        when driving in to Reno that morning with Keenan, and
        Brian Crockett, both Keenan and Brian Crockett kept
        saying "I don't know nothing. I don't know
        nothing," and that had made him feel intimidated
        again.  But
        when he decided to change his story, said Hallert, he
        lied again -- this time about why he had lied before.
        That was acknowledged under defense cross-examination.  A
        statement by Hallert, hand-written the evening of his
        grand jury testimony, said the reason for his false
        witness was that he had been 
 | afraid of "Joe Bailie and his
        militia." The paper had mentioned nothing about
        defendant Keenan.  
 | |
Want to share your opinion? Electric Nevada's comment page is open!